Fluids Group Seminar

Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 11:00 am to 12:00 pm

Abstract:
Current visions and modelling of stratified geophysical turbulence are to a large extent based on the conventional paradigm, leaving no alternative to the downgradient turbulent transports (quantified via turbulent viscosity, heat conductivity and diffusivity) and the forward cascades of kinetic energy and other properties of turbulence – towards molecular dissipations. These concepts underlie turbulence-closure models, theory/modelling of turbulent diffusion, and Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory (MOST) of the surface-layer turbulence. In this framework, turbulence in super-critically stable stratifications typical of free atmosphere andocean thermocline is considered as principally the same as in sub-critically stable boundary layers, but just weak due to strong static stability and weak velocity shears. In unstable stratification, convective turbulence generated by buoyancy forces is considered as principally the same as mechanical turbulence generated by mean velocity shears and, thus, subjected to the forward cascades. Recent observational evidences have disclosed principal drawbacks of the conventional theory of stratified turbulence and intolerable uncertainties in its modelling. Nevertheless, neither MOST nor traditional turbulence-closure nor turbulent diffusion models are seriously questioned. Their drawbacks root in the commonly recognised paradigm attributed to Kolmogorov (1941a, b; 1942). However, Kolmogorov only considered shear-generated turbulence in neutrally stratified flows, where his major concepts: (i) only forward energy cascade – from larger to smaller eddies, towards dissipation, and (ii) only down-gradient turbulent fluxes, serve as reasonable approximations. Moreover, Kolmogorov was not responsible for the extension of his paradigm to stratified turbulence. This was made by his followers without proof. This talk demonstrates that the conventional paradigm makes a Procrustean bed for the theory of turbulence in bothunstable stratification (Zilitinkevich, 1973, 2013; Zilitinkevich at al., 2006) and strongly stable stratification (Zilitinkevich et al., 2008, 2013). Wehighlight its restrictive nature; demonstrates miscarriages of conventional theory as applied to essentially stratified flows; and outline Energy- and Flux-Budget (EFB) turbulence-energetics and closure theory accounting for non-gradient turbulent fluxes in both stable and unstable stratifications, inverse energy cascade in convective turbulence, and PBL-scale self-organised convective motions generated via inverse cascades.

Location: 
E-Quad E225
Speaker(s): 

GFDL Formal Seminar

Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm
Location: Smagorinsky Seminar Rom 209

GFDL Informal Seminar

Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 10:30 am to 11:30 am
Location: Smagorinsky Seminar Room 209

David Bradford Energy and Environmental Policy Seminar

Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
Location: 300 Wallace Hall

GEO Department Lecture

Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm
Location: Guyot 10

GEO Department Lecture

Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 12:30 pm to 1:30 pm
Location: Guyot 10

ACEE Highlight Seminar Series

Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 12:30 pm to 1:30 pm
Location: Maeder Hall

Environmental Geology & Geochemistry Seminar (EGGS)

Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 12:30 pm to 1:30 pm
Location: Guyto 220

GFDL Formal Seminar

Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm
Location: Smagorinsky Seminar Room 209

GEO Department Lecture

Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
Location: Guyot 220

David Bradford Energy and Environmental Policy Seminar

Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
Location: 300 Wallace Hall